dommyman
Perennial Contributor
Posts: 876
Threads: 21
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
0
|
RE: Photo posting
(22-11-2014, 06:44 PM)Steady the Edward Wrote: Sorry to have to tell you Dommy but you have the wrong number on that bike !! Its a lot more than 110 days its actually a 189, I hope you remember to tell that Stick 's fellow that me myself and I had to show you how it was done and that I had been. Stood in the right field as I did it , lol better dash off and check that as I just put the first thing up that I had a code for lol
I deliberately tried it with a photo that I would not use in the countdown Eddy, can't use the shot twice can we.
I was wondering about a countdown on this website, but reading Malcolm's latest post, I think it will be ok, if we all stick to the size of file he states. That's a good idea, as some of the pictures were getting too large on the "other" site anyway.
|
|
23-11-2014, 02:35 PM |
|
Malcolm
Administrator
Posts: 20,579
Threads: 18,390
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation:
0
|
RE: Photo posting
Hi,
And here is the same picture saved at 72dpi & at a size of approx 60kb retaining the same physical size.
A decent graphics programme to re-format pictures for upload, can save one heck of a lot of server space.
All pictures that I upload are set in my software to be at 72dpi or less (if they are sometimes supplied by others).
Is there any difference in noticeable clarity ??
Be right back. I am going to go find myself, and if I leave before I get back, make sure to tell me !! -
|
|
23-11-2014, 07:20 PM |
|
sticky
Perennial Contributor
Posts: 889
Threads: 43
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation:
0
|
RE: Photo posting
A word of warning to people new to re-sizing images: Create a new folder and save them in that, separate to the original file otherwise you run the risk of making your picture files to small to print from! Unless for picture storing host can do that without compromising the originals.
Good call on 72dpi - it's fine for viewing on screen. You only need the usual 300dpi if you want to make prints.
While we're on the general subject, Malcolm - can you let me know if it's acceptable for me to watermark my images with my website address? It's opaque at approx 45%. I do that to try and protect myself from theft. Even so, I found some of my shots on a Czech website the other day and the guy that pinched them had even put his own copyright mark on them!
|
|
24-11-2014, 01:02 AM |
|
vtwin
Just Getting Started
Posts: 3
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
0
|
RE: Photo posting
I use Google/Picasa for my pics. They can b easily set to public or private. Even if a picture is in a private folder, I can still post it for every one to see with a direct link.
in the link for the above picture, there is text "....vN0/ s480/IMG_8644.JPG" I can manually change the size of the inserted picture by changing the value s480 to for example s1024, s640 and so on..
|
|
24-11-2014, 09:29 AM |
|
dommyman
Perennial Contributor
Posts: 876
Threads: 21
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
0
|
RE: Photo posting
(24-11-2014, 05:19 PM)rutolander Wrote: (24-11-2014, 02:21 PM)captainsparkledotcom Wrote: I think (only think at the mo'!) that if you insert pic, then click on it,
'grab' the corner & drag it in, it tells you what the size is, so you can adjust it accordingly.
Is that right?
Just tried that it didn't work for me.
Have been trying to get my head around PPI, DPI, Apple Pie, file size When I resize to 72 resolution with PSE all I get is a very small pic with large pixels
I just tried resizing the original photo to 72dpi in my photo editing software, and this is the result, looks ok to me and file size is quite small.
If I resize the picture size first, and then change the dpi to 72 I finish up with a tiny picture with huge pixels just as Rutolander.
|
|
24-11-2014, 09:08 PM |
|
|