I know I am going to get slated for this, but don't you think that the Southern Club runs a pretty good meeting anyway.
The problem with all these questionaires is two fold:-
1) If those that fill in the forms and send them in with possibly many good ideas, see that there is no changes made to a race program, then there will be people saying what was the actual point?
2) If there are small changes made then people will pick holes in the ones made and say why wasn't this done instead.
I think it is good to get feedback, but think that this format of asking what would you change is making a rod for the back of the organisers. Look at what happened with the TT. There were major changes made by dropping the 2 strokes and look at the reaction that had.
I think that Southern format is a good one for many reasons. For one it is a great supporter of the 2 strokes, and to tell you the truth I can see that continuing for many years. I also believe that the organisers look to put a meeting on that the riders love coming to. Its the old adage that if you put a great meeting on then the riders will come and because of that, the people will come to watch. How many opportunities do people get on the Island now to see 2 strokers raced in anger round a road circuit?
Anyway thats my own personal view, but what the heck noone listens to me anyway.... :wink: :wink:
When people say one thing and mean another its called politics, when organisers say one thing and mean another its called a mistake, when the ACU say one thing and mean another its called information.