Hmmmm. Maybe a little over reaction on my behalf, I accept.BUT,Ammo, in your second message you clearly make a fairly negative remark, i.e. "presumably riders don't want LIASON(noun) definition " To communicate between groups" with the riders cos they might well find out things they didn't really want to know" As riders representative, my job was to LIASE between riders and the organisers. We are playing around with words here, Representative or liason, they're both under the same umbrella, and your comments imply that riders are not being heard.With the 400/125 issue, we at the riders forum fought like hell to keep the class, but where the riders when it came to getting their entry in?
My main point about your remarks are for you to all remain positive, and optimistic, but by all means define genuine weaknesses in the organisation.I welcome all comments, both positive and negative, but don't be surprised if you get reaction back. That's what this message board is all about.
I apologise Ammo, if you think I over reacted, I just think your remarks do touch on my job. In your final sentence you veer towards the negative again, by stating that "somehow I don't think LIASING will come into it very much, with the riders as a whole". In my opinion, a completely unfair remark, and I ask you again as I stated in my original message, to give Paul and Milky a chance.
OK are we friends now?