thewitch Wrote:Ah, but, Oatssi, he has had the expert opinion of F C Moore, who states unequivocally that "If he does take legal action he will certainly win."
If I get myself into a dangerous situation against all common sense, I will certainly consult that highly qualified QC...oh, no, not qualified... that should have been opinionated.
I seem to recall the same person moaning about the number of prohibited areas ruining the TT.

Excuse me, if he was at a Burger van and had bought anything he then becomes a paying customer, where is the public liability insurance.
He says he was stood alongside a Burger Van, a facility open to the public and not in a restricted area or an area considered a danger to the public. Who's responsibility was it to site the Burger van at this area.
It was a freak accident and not the fault of the spectator in this case, he has lost out financially and has suffered pain. All he is asking is for loss of earnings and to me that is a reasonable request, He could claim for a lot more like for pain and suffering but is not. Its not a big sum of money and would be a good gesture to pay the man.

Yes Helen I did complain about restricted area during TT and stand by them complaints, this accident is a different case and should be treated as such.

Quick question, if you had been stood outside a burger van and were hit by a vehicle and badly injured would you claim