MGP too many classes
Jeff Kirby Offline
Junior Member
**

Posts: 27
Threads: 6
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 0
#18
RE: MGP too many classes
George

Once again, I have to justify myself to you. Not only that, you are implying that I am not doing my job properly by allowing four stroke machines out on to the course without oil containment, contrary to the regulations and that has annoyed me.

The oil containment for Classics was introduced as a strongly recommended item in 2009 after John Goodall's tragic accident in 2008. It was made compulsory in 2010 and is now accepted by all MGP Classic four stroke competitors. Obviously these machines were never designed to have oil containment and some of the solutions are quite ingenious and maintain the original apperance. Such a machine is number 28 ridden by Gordon Yule. If Gordon is at next year's MGP I shall be very happy to show you how Gordon has achieved it.

The aluminium tray on Alan Brew's machine can be clearly seen by his right boot. It can also be seen here http://www.sport-pics.co.uk/2011_Season/...cjunlwt/1c

Nigel Moore's solution on machine number 6 is far more basic but it can be seen at http://www.sport-pics.co.uk/2011_Season/...cjunlwt/1c

As you say you know the regulation then you will be aware that the requirement is to hold at least half of the total oil and coolant capacity of the engine in the event of an engine failure. This brings us to Stuart Garton's beautiful machine, number 25, which is quite obviously a BSA Gold Star engine in a Rickman frame. It has a separate engine and gearbox, is air cooled and has a separate oil tank and even if a conrod broke and came through the bottom of the crankcase, the amount of oil in the engine is minimal as was proved when that happened to Gold Star Ron's machine with Kevin Murphy on board two year's ago. The fairing on Stuart's machine extends back behind the engine and has a dam fitted to the rear lip so it meets the requirements.

Just because you think that you cannot see oil containment does not mean it is not there, the Classic crowd are far more resourceful than the modern riders.

I refuse to get into a slanging match with someone who seems to do it for a living but I am not going to stand by while criticism is aimed unfairly at the scrutineering team in general and me in particular . I am pleased that there are people like an old man returns that are prepared to support us. Thank you, Ken.

Thanks also to Rusty for using his photographs as evidence.

Jeff Kirby
16-09-2011, 11:15 AM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
MGP too many classes - by George - 14-09-2011, 05:13 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by ian charlton - 14-09-2011, 07:47 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by an old man returns - 15-09-2011, 01:14 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by sticky - 15-09-2011, 03:12 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by George - 15-09-2011, 05:08 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by cregnybaa - 15-09-2011, 05:42 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by George - 15-09-2011, 05:53 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by cregnybaa - 15-09-2011, 07:16 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by sticky - 15-09-2011, 07:47 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by pppdrive - 15-09-2011, 10:17 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by Jo Rowe - 15-09-2011, 08:43 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by George - 15-09-2011, 10:06 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by cregnybaa - 15-09-2011, 10:29 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by George - 15-09-2011, 11:40 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by an old man returns - 16-09-2011, 08:05 AM
RE: MGP too many classes - by an old man returns - 15-09-2011, 10:26 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by ian charlton - 16-09-2011, 06:47 AM
RE: MGP too many classes - by Jeff Kirby - 16-09-2011, 11:15 AM
RE: MGP too many classes - by George - 16-09-2011, 02:14 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by ian charlton - 16-09-2011, 12:51 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by Jo Rowe - 16-09-2011, 01:08 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by Gstarron - 17-09-2011, 06:57 PM
RE: MGP too many classes - by David Linsdell - 17-09-2011, 09:07 PM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)