We don't need this.
Anonymous
Unregistered

 
#10
Re: We don't need this.
As I've said elsewhere, Wooldridge (Woolridge??) has been flogging this horse for at least 20+ years.

His approach is no more informed now than ever it was.

Ignore him -- the purpose of journalists in general is not to improve the human lot, but rather to sell more papers.

The only problem with them is that if you take them on, you're always playing an away match, and you get kicked off the park.

By the next week, he'd no doubt found another target to persecute - that's his job after all.

He'll not bother us again until next year -- if, that is, the TT hasn't suffered from the ACU's suicidal tendencies!!!!!!
29-06-2003, 03:34 PM
Reply


Messages In This Thread
We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 26-06-2003, 11:31 PM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 27-06-2003, 06:01 PM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 27-06-2003, 06:36 PM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 27-06-2003, 09:44 PM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 28-06-2003, 12:32 AM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 28-06-2003, 07:04 AM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 29-06-2003, 09:11 AM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 29-06-2003, 09:12 AM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 29-06-2003, 10:48 AM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 29-06-2003, 03:34 PM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 29-06-2003, 07:35 PM
Re: We don't need this. - by Anonymous - 30-06-2003, 01:33 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)