Kells
Anonymous
Unregistered

 
#17
Re: rrr.com
I'm with both Cargo & the aged David on this.

As has been said, there's room for two good sites and as to the "cost" of RRR, it's well worth paying for the service provided. Don't forget, the boys have put a hell of a lot of their own money and time into it, and its very success, especially in the forum area, meant that substantial further expenditure was needed.

It may be a matter of choice -- me, I'll take both, and say thanks to both enthusiasts, Stephen & Malcolm, for making them available to us, trusting as I do that neither will take any offence at being mentioned in the same sentence!!!
29-07-2003, 10:53 PM
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 08:32 AM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 01:47 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 04:56 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 06:20 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 06:47 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 07:33 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 08:42 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 09:32 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 09:33 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 09:53 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 28-07-2003, 09:54 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 29-07-2003, 08:37 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 29-07-2003, 08:41 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 29-07-2003, 08:46 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 29-07-2003, 09:28 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 29-07-2003, 10:06 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 29-07-2003, 10:53 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 29-07-2003, 11:25 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 30-07-2003, 06:53 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 30-07-2003, 07:34 PM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 30-07-2003, 07:39 PM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 31-07-2003, 12:51 AM
Re: rrr.com - by Anonymous - 31-07-2003, 07:49 AM
Re: Kells - by Anonymous - 31-07-2003, 06:54 PM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)