Not TT but!
Anonymous
Unregistered

 
#7
Re: Not TT but!
But i thought Decisions like that had to be confirmed with the SACU, Who incidentaly were infuriated to have not been consulted on this matter?
How does someone who has then won the championship get to compete on there 400? Assuming that they cannot afford to do another class?
Well on speaking to certain folk, Bob Grant and others, would be welcome to ride at East Fortune, So is this not a roundabout way of pushing riders away?, The rewards of winning a championship! If this is the case why not do it for EVERY class,Then people would have something to say!
and on reading in Bikesportnews this is being classed as a Scottish Championship event? since when? Silly i think!
26-03-2004, 08:54 PM
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 26-03-2004, 11:15 AM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 26-03-2004, 01:14 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 26-03-2004, 05:25 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 26-03-2004, 06:36 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 26-03-2004, 08:39 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 26-03-2004, 08:40 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 26-03-2004, 08:54 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 26-03-2004, 11:03 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 27-03-2004, 12:11 AM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 27-03-2004, 12:26 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 27-03-2004, 07:35 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 27-03-2004, 08:25 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 27-03-2004, 08:56 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 27-03-2004, 09:28 PM
Re: Not TT but! - by Anonymous - 27-03-2004, 09:46 PM



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)