In my view there is still no benefit from saying that the compromise of adhesion at the 32nd is this that or the other we still cant go in to detail how wide is it for how far oil water , we just cant give that much info , so we do what we can and say in this or that area take care , the rain flag is a good example of the mix up of the use and interpretation of flags ( something I have said ever since I started marshaling should be uniformed throughout the world at all levels) at BSB we show the rain flag if there is rain in the air and then if the track becomes compromised through water we put the adhesion flag out with it , saying that the track is now compromised by WATER , then if the track becomes compromised by something other than water  I E   oil - debris- or anything else we remove the rain flag , there for differentiating between water and other contamination problems , that offers as much information as possible , water would tend to be full circuit other problems more localised to smaller areas , but at TT different marshals interpret the meanings in different ways , some only put out the rain flag as the track gets wet , some want it out as  the first spot of rain is felt , the use of flags should be uniformed to reduce the ( riders say why bother we passed there last time and they had a flag out and there was nothing there ) and the attitude of some marshals that I HATE WITH A VENGEANCE ( put it out just in case ) there  should be NO just in case !!  IT IS OR IT ISN'T  

and limiters at the scene of an incident is a DEFINITE NO NO  , as I said before at one incident 80mph would be fine but at another 30 is too much simple as that