spannerman
Member
Posts: 214
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation:
0
|
RE: NW200 Top Team and riders withdrawn
(11-05-2023, 11:08 PM)spannerman Wrote: Australian rider Brookes told the BBC that his team - which also includes top rider Peter Hickman - had withdrawn from the event.
On Thursday evening, the FHO Racing BMW team issued a statement to confirm its decision.
The statement read: "The FHO Racing BMW Motorrad team are withdrawing from the 2023 fonaCAB and Nicholl Oils North West 200 due to no confidence in the application of the Superstock technical regulations.
“The Superstock class technical regulations mandate the machines must fully comply with conditions regarding the wheels, where Superstock machines must remain with the originally homologated wheels from the manufacturer, which from BMW are carbon.
You can not use carbon wheels at the TT so i wonder how they will come off with the regulations to change the rules to use alloy wheels in the superstock race.
|
|
11-05-2023, 11:10 PM |
|
captainsparkledotcom
Moderator
Posts: 1,971
Threads: 540
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
2
|
RE: NW200 Top Team and riders withdrawn
Organizers statement here -
https://www.northwest200.org/statement-f...est-200-3/
Such a shame, when, just a few weeks ago, the event wasn't even going to happen.
Can't believe this wasn't sorted beforehand,
FHO reading & questioning the regs,
scrutineers pointing out the legality (or otherwise!) of carbon wheels at the time of scrutineering,
daftness of a rule that seems to say "those wheels won't do, but if you change them that won't do either"!!
Not good at all.
|
|
12-05-2023, 08:21 AM |
|
captainsparkledotcom
Moderator
Posts: 1,971
Threads: 540
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
2
|
RE: NW200 Top Team and riders withdrawn
|
|
12-05-2023, 08:27 AM |
|
ian333
Member
Posts: 79
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation:
0
|
RE: NW200 Top Team and riders withdrawn
In defense of the NW200 (promoter), the governing body through which all racing in Ireland is sanctioned (north and south) is the MCUI. As I best understand it, they are the official body that grants the track certificate and sets forth the rules and regulations - and as we are so acutely aware, puts in place the insurance coverage. My guess is unlike the IOM Govt and its ability to better control its own destiny with the ACU, the NW event has to fall in line with the MCUI’s overall road racing regulations. Obviously, the NW200 has a responsibility to bring clarity to these rules and regulations but I guess the devil is in the details. I remember many years ago the NW200 didn’t allow Ducati’s due to them being in excess of 750cc being the issue I think. This was an MCUI rule as I understand as clearly it was in the NW200’s best interests to allow Ducati bikes on the grid. The same issue happened again a couple of years ago with the Norton that McGuinness was wanting to ride being in excess of 1000cc.
Some people have pointed to scrutinering but the primary reason for scrutinerring is safety, not to 100% validate the compliance of a bike - that will always be the responsibility of the rider.
Per the NW200 statement, once the stewards of the meeting had made their decision, it is final. There is nothing Mervyn White and his team can do - no different than when a rider at the TT is thrown out due to a tech infringement found after the fact. Paul Phillips would have no role in attempting to reverse the situation.
Road racing in Northern Ireland continues to decline. There are many reasons for this but the MCUI and the organising clubs/promoters have played a role - especially the MCUI in my uneducated opinion. I am sure there are lots of well intentioned good individuals involved but seemingly as an organization, something is broken.
Very sad and does not bode well for the future. That SS race last night was arguably the best race I have ever witnessed in 45+ years of watching the NW. 6-7 riders going hammers and tongs inches apart for 6 laps of public roads is all that is great for this sport. 15 mins later this debacle happens.
There are no winners here and unfortunately the NW200 loses some credibility here. Teams spend a fortune these days and my fear is some will start to think twice of the value proposition and their participation
(This post was last modified: 12-05-2023, 02:46 PM by ian333.)
|
|
12-05-2023, 02:45 PM |
|
captainsparkledotcom
Moderator
Posts: 1,971
Threads: 540
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
2
|
RE: NW200 Top Team and riders withdrawn
(12-05-2023, 03:00 PM)c iom tt Wrote: So if a bike is presented at scrutinering with a turbo on it, it would be passed?
I was thinking about this, and can't come to a conclusion!!!
would there be any need for post race stripdowns?
Could anybody have an oversized bike?
illegal parts, internal or otherwise?
Some things are very obvious, others not so much.
I raced my Triumph Rocket a couple of times, hill climb-sprints, even had the Powerbike record at one place (ok, ok I was the only one! )
but was then told ACU rules say maximum 1500cc!
It was in the rules, I hadn't read them fully.
In answer to your question, I would think not, hope not anyway!
|
|
12-05-2023, 04:14 PM |
|
ian333
Member
Posts: 79
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation:
0
|
RE: NW200 Top Team and riders withdrawn
(12-05-2023, 03:00 PM)c iom tt Wrote: So if a bike is presented at scrutinering with a turbo on it, it would be passed?
Not sure what answer you are looking for here. What always seems to be lost when situations like these arise is this - we are all in this together. We all want road racing to succeed and thrive. 99% of the people involved are doing because they love it and want to to continue. Be it riders, marshals, scrutineers, officials, fans, mechanics etc. I am not into conspiracy theories. Don’t think anyone got up yesterday morning and said right, let’s see how I can screw this event/team/rider.
(This post was last modified: 12-05-2023, 04:27 PM by ian333.)
|
|
12-05-2023, 04:27 PM |
|
c iom tt
Senior Member
Posts: 687
Threads: 16
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
2
|
RE: NW200 Top Team and riders withdrawn
(12-05-2023, 04:27 PM)ian333 Wrote: Not sure what answer you are looking for here. What always seems to be lost when situations like these arise is this - we are all in this together. We all want road racing to succeed and thrive. 99% of the people involved are doing because they love it and want to to continue. Be it riders, marshals, scrutineers, officials, fans, mechanics etc. I am not into conspiracy theories. Don’t think anyone got up yesterday morning and said right, let’s see how I can screw this event/team/rider.
Because you stated.
Some people have pointed to scrutinering but the primary reason for scrutinerring is safety, not to 100% validate the compliance of a bike - that will always be the responsibility of the rider.
I think its reasonable for everyone to assume that scrutinising as well as checking the safety of the bike, but also to make sure there is nothing on it that should not be.
As for conspiracy theories, an lot of people will have attended to see Josh Brookes, letting him practice fulfills part of that without it all kicking off after the race. If the Carbon wheels are not safe to race, they are not safe to practice, which brings me right back to scrutineering
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want something bad enough, you'll find a way. If you don't, you'll find an excuse
|
|
12-05-2023, 07:05 PM |
|
milestone 11
Member
Posts: 121
Threads: 9
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation:
0
|
RE: NW200 Top Team and riders withdrawn
I believe the removal by the organisers of FHO from the grid for the Superstock was disgraceful. The action gave the event little credibility and damaged the credibility of the sport as a whole. However, I wonder which wheels FHO intended to use in the Superbike class.
There is no doubt that the Superstock regs are ambiguous at best, as in reality, the rules did not allow them to use any wheels at all. the rule covering Superstock are copied here.
Quote:10. Wheels:
● Wheels must remain as originally produced by the manufacturer at the time of
sale into the dealer/distributor network for the homologated machine.
● No Carbon fibre composite wheels are allowed, only aluminum alloys wheels
are permitted to be used.
Based upon this rule FHO were right to withdraw from the meeting only on the basis of the Superstock. If it were the intention to use the carbon wheels in the Superbike class, which I'm sure they were as they claimed to have no alloy wheels at all, they clearly would have been in breach of the rules because they are worded, right or not, very differently as can be seen below,
Quote:8. Wheels
● Wheels may be replaced and associated part may be altered or replace from
those fitted to the homologated motorcycle.
● Aftermarket wheels must be made from aluminum alloy.
● No Carbon fibre composite wheels are allowed, only aluminum alloys wheels
are permitted to be used
.
It seems to me that possibly both FHO and BMW need to read the rules a little more carefully or was their total withdrawal merely a device to save face in the longer term? Regardless, this nonsensical rule only applies to the NW 200 and other Northern Irish road racing.
(This post was last modified: 14-05-2023, 11:26 AM by milestone 11.)
|
|
14-05-2023, 11:18 AM |
|
|